Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/impact
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
what if we funded public goods the way companies do affiliate marketing... except instead of compensating affiliates for driving traffic/sales, we compensated the sources/dependencies of a public good for driving progress, and we did so in proportion to the impact of each contribution
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions
BrightFutureGuy 🎩↑Ⓜ️
@bfg
Great idea 🫶 Isn’t impact quantification an issue? 👀
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
in what sense? I mean, the expectation is gradual improvement over time, I don't expect the impact valuation to be perfect from the start
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tmo - nature coiner
@tmoindustries
i don't think we will ever really know what the "buyer" / funder really wants as valuation is subjective and relational - imo just provide as many indicators and metrics as possible of the work and go from there karma gap, passport, astral place, regen network, etc - stack & bundle
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mike | Abundance 🌟
@abundance
I wouldn't expect the funder to determine internal proportion of contribution. But those creating the public good can (and should) come to an internal consensus on relative contributions (perhaps as a condition to getting funding). But yes, more data is always better
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
tmo - nature coiner
@tmoindustries
💯 That’s why we just value all of it in $’s. Does not mean price but value. Funder gets tons of value for price.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
