I wish crypto did a better job of delineating tokens who give you a real world claim vs. not. Crudely, ETH is a digital coin you put in the machine for it to run your instructions, gov tokens are mostly ballots that allow you to direct a stream of other virtual coins. Big simplification, but diff than a claim on RWAs.

(summer of) protocol {support | guild | fellowship} ☀️


lack of innovation around tokenized RWAs.

regulatory frameworks needed before more meaningful adoption.

exploring the matrix onchain 🌀 | ops wizard 🪄 | hosting /defi • /the-glyph • /pixelglyphs • /autism


absolutely, the challenge lies not just in creating distinctions but in innovatively structuring tokens to reflect their unique characteristics and intended uses.

My point is the opposite: not having a good distinction makes it hard to actually get to a better end state w.r.t. broader adoption/innovation. "RWAs" is a decent start, but it feels like an incomplete distinction.

In the US, definitely. But there are local solutions that already work well. Hiero raised using tokenize.it, a German platform. Fully regulated and still a normal erc-20 on Ethereum.