Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

two3oh2 🎩 pfp
two3oh2 🎩
@2302
i’ll give all my degen out accordingly in about 3 hours https://farcaster.dep.dev/poll/660369224ea1215e8e27a42d
18 replies
3 recasts
33 reactions

eggman πŸ”΅ pfp
eggman πŸ”΅
@eggman.eth
If I'm right in assuming Blast is PoA, a targeted rollback COULD be done which essentially just refunds depositors from the exploiter's wallet. I dont think Blast is going for decentralization tbh. It's a degen gaming chain. I'd support a targeted rollback if it didn't rollback/affect legit txs during that time.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Applebong πŸŽ©πŸ„ pfp
Applebong πŸŽ©πŸ„
@degenfarmer69.eth
A rollback is not the best option as you would erase other users legit activity. A invalid state transition that transfers ETH from hackers wallet to safe wallet should be the best option.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

BrixBountyFarm 🎩 pfp
BrixBountyFarm 🎩
@brixbounty
haven't followed it... was it a coding issue due to Blast or the contract built upon the top of Blast? 60 mil ? / TVL question of what the impact is long term... will be watching. I haven't touched blast too busy to be everywhere.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

phoenix 🎩 pfp
phoenix 🎩
@phoenix
Aye the people choose wise 500 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Anas.degen.eth β“‚οΈπŸŽ©πŸŽ­ pfp
Anas.degen.eth β“‚οΈπŸŽ©πŸŽ­
@0xmugiwaraanas
Rollback βœ”οΈ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LazyFrankπŸ¦‰ pfp
LazyFrankπŸ¦‰
@lazyfrank
It’s going to be so interesting to see which path they go. Both with positives and negatives
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ⓜ️rFuego.degen πŸ”₯🎩 pfp
Ⓜ️rFuego.degen πŸ”₯🎩
@mrfuego.eth
Idk what this means but yes. πŸ”₯
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
it’s not ideal but here we are https://warpcast.com/matthewb/0xa2c15adf
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nick Wolf 🎩 pfp
Nick Wolf 🎩
@nickwolf
The chain is already centralized as it is…Might as well use that and act in the best interest of your users since decentralization is not a priority
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Zuphioh πŸŽ©πŸ”΅ pfp
Zuphioh πŸŽ©πŸ”΅
@zebra
Rollback or face chaindeath due to funding north korea
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Chrisisvenom pfp
Chrisisvenom
@chrisisvenom
Like any other hack, we took a risk, sucks to say, but keep as is and let them patch the error, attempt to regain the trust of the community, and see what happens after that
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nvrndr pfp
nvrndr
@aithehumanity.eth
Zach was the secret third thing
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

(zyn/acc)inoπŸ”΅πŸŽ© pfp
(zyn/acc)inoπŸ”΅πŸŽ©
@tvcker
think Cobie nailed it: "The act of rolling back the chain is not the sin, having the ability to roll back the chain is the sin. If they can roll it back and they choose not to, then they kinda funded north korea optionally for their own comercial/marketing benefit. They never should have the power to begin with.."
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nvrndr pfp
nvrndr
@aithehumanity.eth
leave it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Bixbite πŸ‘½  pfp
Bixbite πŸ‘½
@bixbite
They kind of have to leave it the way it is, if not it ruins the credibility of the project. It's not like they can rollback just those transactions, the whole chain gets rolled back so imagine how many TXNs that voids & what effects that has on the ecosystem. Let the authorities handle the Hackers, not the Devs. πŸ€“
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mithil 🎩 pfp
Mithil 🎩
@mithil
lfg ⚑πŸ’ͺ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction