whatever the metric for real wallets for real humans, that's it (for the industry, not a single product).

cofounder @absinthe | building is just professional tinkering | cynical optimist | xkcd#538

this was meant in reference to the industry not a single project

I could not disagree more. unique wallets say absolutely nothing about the health of a project, just how badly sybilled it got. An extremely high number of unique wallets would indicate to me the opposite

Good token price has the effect of bringing good builders onboard. often price comes first, good tech comes second

Explaining complicated things in simple words. Contributor to blockchain newsletter project: https://www.blockswithbenefits.com

that's important, but the more people opted in with wallets, the easier and more reasonable it is to build interoperable experiences that will eventually make them active.

What about transactions per wallet? Continued engagement > one-off interest.

Would true unique users be better than unique wallets?

In fact, the lower the latter, the higher the former (in theory)

Neither are. Unique wallets is almost meaningless

We could not agree more, Sybil resistance is a must for the next big crypto wave. At kinto.xyz we did exactly that a sybil resistance, safety first L2