Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
43 replies
6 recasts
95 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
Relevant: https://warpcast.com/phil/0x9971b751
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions

0xdesigner pfp
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
what happens when this happens? not even for emergency, for value accrual https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xf6a6e2f0
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
That would imply the app is better than Warpcast so why go through the hassle? :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samuel pfp
Samuel
@samuellhuber
Then users decide where they spend their time. Also some clients will simply crosspost and aggregate for you most likely. Though I don’t see two forks being viable as it’s hard enough to grow social already. If protocol size is in the hundreds of millions you likely may find maintainers for different forks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction