Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
66 reactions
phil
@phil
Relevant: https://warpcast.com/phil/0x9971b751
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
what happens when this happens? not even for emergency, for value accrual https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0xf6a6e2f0
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Samuel
@samuellhuber.eth
Then users decide where they spend their time. Also some clients will simply crosspost and aggregate for you most likely. Though I don’t see two forks being viable as it’s hard enough to grow social already. If protocol size is in the hundreds of millions you likely may find maintainers for different forks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
phil
@phil
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
That would imply the app is better than Warpcast so why go through the hassle? :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction