nouns-protocol

nouns-protocol

Post new ideas and feedback on protocol changes, earn ETH: https://rounds.wtf/nouns-protocol/nouns-protocol-summer-24-round-1-1

Elad pfp

Round reward fixed thanks to @seneca Claim below! https://rounds.wtf/nouns-protocol/nouns-protocol-summer-24-round-1-1

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

rocketman pfp

cross posting for visibility https://warpcast.com/rocketman/0xe8cc22ca

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

rocketman pfp

long term I want to make the nouns dao executor the owner of these new flow contracts but they're on @base is there anything simple i can do to give the DAO more ownership over them without having to have the entire DAO move over?

1 reply

1 recast

4 reactions

rocketman pfp

The biggest outstanding question on our Nouns proposal for streaming grants continues to be: How do we structure the recursive stream tree and decide the list of approved grants recipients in each pool? Luckily, there's a mechanism out there for aligning incentives around the creation of lists. nouns.camp/proposals/582 prop updated 🤝

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

What's the latest thinking on L2? I feel like the 7 day delay going from L2 -> mainnet is a big limitation. But being able to spin up gov related contracts on L2 (contract based nouncil for example) would be cool to reduce costs a bit. Just not sure how it gets done, wonder if anyone has any thinking here.

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

1𝐴35𝐸1 pfp

Rough ideas after reading: https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/gnTdSqqiZC7OmqL8Dix-hEek5Sim1abC1BsZNm9_h-s I think the key design challenge here is not requiring people to place their NOUN in a new contract. Off the cuff ideas - Could update governor to have an exclude list - People who delegate to a pool, get a soulbound NFT which prevents double vote problem - Burn soulbound NFT to get normal voting privileges again - Governor lists known pool contracts similar to well-known Clients

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Spencer Perkins pfp

Spencer Perkins

@spencerperkins.eth

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Elad pfp

https://warpcast.com/el4d/0x6153c2ba

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Elad pfp

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

any justification from the team here? I can only speak for myself but I deliberately spent time thinking and interacting with protocol channel because there was such a strong reward. It feels like a horrible precedent to set that you can change the rewards after the round ends.

4 replies

0 recast

8 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

sorry to be annoying about this but the round closed 4 days ago @seneca maybe make it so it's not possible to start a round without depositing the reward

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

Is the protocol round going to be topped up 👉👈

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Sandy pfp

Hey i just try our site and its great impressed and good I like the features offered by the team, as a user I feel very comfortable and easly to understand great @el4d 🔥🔥

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

datadanne pfp

I feel like standing bids are an interesting design space. With enough bids they could be useful for projecting auction revenue and help guide how much to spend. And long-term standing bids would signal strong nouns interest/alignment, could be used to suggest governance delegates for inactive holders

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Michael Gingras (lilfrog) pfp

Michael Gingras (lilfrog)

https://github.com/mcgingras/noun-swapper/blob/main/src/NounSwapper.sol Minimal POC for a contract that would custody all of the t-nouns and let anyone swap for a fee without having to create a proposal. Looking for feedback on contract and also if this is something worth seriously pursuing.

3 replies

0 recast

5 reactions