Nouns

One Noun, every day, forever.

nouns.wtf

Nouns, Lil Nouns, bitNouns ⌐◨-◨ Currently building @artistprogram_ 
 and nouns.world Linktr.ee/mikeg.studio

not trying to be disingenuous here, genuinely curious: are you not anon? is the difference just depth of pockets or something else?

i understand the notion that things can feel uncertain when new members enter with large voting power but this is the nature of the experiment -- in theory, you or me or anyone could amass a large number of votes. And if we think/agree that auction price is at all correlated with longterm success of nouns, is not attracting participants like Jane exactly what we want and are all trying to achieve?

curious what the community thinks about this since its a sentiment i see pop up now and then

my off the cuff take is that old/current nouns voters/members generally struggle to see new influential voters enter, its a power shift dynamic that is built into nouns but can feel uncertain and unpredictable*

insofar nouns is a train that is both built and wrecked at the same time (h/t mikegood), the status quo feels 'safe' and 'steady' and in some ways its 'the mess we understand'

i wont pretend im fully immune to the feeling of uncertainty, but i think ive learned to embrace it over the years. and i think you can make a case for this cyclical nature of nouns voters/power blocks being 'a very good thing' since it naturally combats stagnation which is a common poison for any org and, honestly, would probably kill nouns rather quickly were we to shut off auctions or otherwise ossify the voter base

(note: not focused on or against mikegood, his comment is just what sparked the thought)