Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yesyes
@yesyes
Boost runs out soon so casting out a loosely held opinion- - I think artists are reasonable to be concerned about AI being trained on their works. > "But AIs learn art the same way humans do!" - yes, the methods could be considered similar but the distribution of that learned AI skill is not at all similar. When an artist released an artwork, they were fully expecting many people to learn from their work then further pass down those skills but they definitely weren't expecting that their skills would become this easily accessible through AI. Scale matters
5 replies
0 recast
29 reactions
yesyes
@yesyes
> Coders are fine with it. Artists should be too - Coders' skills havent been replaced to the same extent as artists'. A lot of coders had a huge scare when devin was announced though devin turned out to be all hype. Coding involves typing, using logic,creativity, knowing the correct syntax and libraies. Knowing the correct syntax and libraries is not as important now but everything still matters. On the contrary, you do not need skilled hands or voice at all to make okayish art anymore. Creativity is still required though i believe AI art is cool and legit as long as it offers something new and is not just an algorithmic redo of already existing work. figuring out how to properly compensate artists is a whole other mess though and i am not sure if it is even possible.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
