Warpcast

threads of comments with real conversations aren't how you shoot up the leaderboard 😤

would the devs plz do something? 💜💜💜
https://warpcast.com/kenny/0x2c86fdc6/quotes

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

shazow.net

Currently: WhatsABI

We do algorithmic reply bumping. 

Strict rule based performs worse across every retention metric.

Any intuition you can share about the current reply bumping approach?

Also were you able to check out this commissioned piece? Any feedback on the analysis?

Any intuition you can share about the current reply bumping approach?

Also were you able to check out this commissioned piece? Any feedback on the analysis?  https://paragraph.xyz/@yesyes/checking-the-comment-velocity-of-real-users

Algo is machine learning. It chooses what you’re likely to engage with. 

Assumption in 1st paragraph in article is incorrect. We changed it because reverse chronological reply bumping feeds are way worse for retention. 

Can read the rest later.

New change to channel feeds on Warpcast

Top-level casts only; no more "reply bumps"

We had the most recent reply show up on casts in channels when we had 95% fewer users. Now channels have plenty of posts, so if you want to see replies, just click into the top-level cast.

The assumption in the first para was taken directly from your post

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x5a5a09ab

Though, i should mention that the article is a little outdated now. Will update the metrics soon.

Blockchain data analyst. Interested in data science and blockchain.

Analysis-
https://www.hypersub.xyz/s/yesyes-analytics-qr0v8onrvev4,
https://dune.com/yesyes

Yeah I realized that after rereading it lol. Will correct it in the article. I think the rest of the article still stands strong, I just objectively looked at the data.

That’s channel feeds not main feeds. :)