Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
would the devs plz do something? ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ’œ https://warpcast.com/kenny/0x2c86fdc6/quotes
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We do algorithmic reply bumping. Strict rule based performs worse across every retention metric.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Any intuition you can share about the current reply bumping approach? Also were you able to check out this commissioned piece? Any feedback on the analysis? https://paragraph.xyz/@yesyes/checking-the-comment-velocity-of-real-users
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Algo is machine learning. It chooses what youโ€™re likely to engage with. Assumption in 1st paragraph in article is incorrect. We changed it because reverse chronological reply bumping feeds are way worse for retention. Can read the rest later.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions