yesyes on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

yesyes pfp

Boost runs out soon so casting out a loosely held opinion- - I think artists are reasonable to be concerned about AI being trained on their works. > "But AIs learn art the same way humans do!" - yes, the methods could be considered similar but the distribution of that learned AI skill is not at all similar. When an artist released an artwork, they were fully expecting many people to learn from their work then further pass down those skills but they definitely weren't expecting that their skills would become this easily accessible through AI. Scale matters

5 replies

4 recasts

33 reactions

yesyes pfp

> "it's a good thing that art is so easily accessible now. Artists are BAD for hating on it" - I do believe that AI is a net positive but i understand the position of artists. Not even thinking of compensating artists for the data used means that there are poor incentives in place. Many tech bros (rightfully to a certain extent) justify the somewhat high prices of medical drugs that are very cheap to make because they understand that research costs money and not compensating people for the research could have consequences.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

g0hst.base.eth pfp

You touch on some very important points regarding the landscape of AI and its cross section with the rest of life, including creativity. I agree with your points, data costs something to someone and it shouldn't be free. Much the same way someone's opinion becomes public domain, building in public, making code public, putting your art out there makes it public and is a vulnerable state to be in. That costs something and deserves to be paid out. You hope its with more views, follows, whatever, but often, it comes with a degree of stress. AI doesn't feel stress. It just builds, and its fascinating. It doesn't know what it doesn't know. We're the square pegs trying to fit into a round hole and AI needs to be more closely examined for potential ethical improvements for all of humanity. Copyright is just one fold and the top minds of the world need to be making some important decisions for mankind with regard to AI's use in public works.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction