Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/no-channel
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yesyes
@yesyes
Boost runs out soon so casting out a loosely held opinion- - I think artists are reasonable to be concerned about AI being trained on their works. > "But AIs learn art the same way humans do!" - yes, the methods could be considered similar but the distribution of that learned AI skill is not at all similar. When an artist released an artwork, they were fully expecting many people to learn from their work then further pass down those skills but they definitely weren't expecting that their skills would become this easily accessible through AI. Scale matters
5 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
yesyes
@yesyes
> "it's a good thing that art is so easily accessible now. Artists are BAD for hating on it" - I do believe that AI is a net positive but i understand the position of artists. Not even thinking of compensating artists for the data used means that there are poor incentives in place. Many tech bros (rightfully to a certain extent) justify the somewhat high prices of medical drugs that are very cheap to make because they understand that research costs money and not compensating people for the research could have consequences.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
