Kien π
@kienfam
who can explain me why? is it working or not? if not, what's wrong?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
yerbearserker.base.eth π§π―
@yerbearserker
It's another way for individuals with large audiences to monetize that audience. We see a few projects attempt to deploy via it, but why wouldn't you go with a Clanker or Clanker Interface to get 40% of fees (or 60% via /glanker Deployment π)? I think the biggest disconnect is presenting it as 'for creators' when really all it does is make their creations worth an incredibly small fraction of a cent. As a tool to fractionalize things, it does that fine. But I don't think this is a tool that really supports the creators it's asking to use it, & rather serves the infrastructure that ends up with the volume. Look at profit splits, how they pay out, & how they support users and it'll tell you if a project is aimed to be extractive/parasitic, or generative/symbiotic Clankers pay out 50% in WETH & 50% in Creator Token, so a creator doesn't need to hit their floor to realize profit. They can then choose to burn or use the tokens for marketing. Zora keeps the WETH & gives the Creators just their token.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kien π
@kienfam
did not know zora is giving 1% of the tokens only, not communicated properly enough @zora is that true?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction