Mike🎩 pfp
Mike🎩
@yekim.eth
think the next iteration of farcaster client is: frames to build use case and distribution -> grow a big enough community that new client is necessary
8 replies
5 recasts
50 reactions

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
frame —> client pipeline is just beginning
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Lost Midas pfp
Lost Midas
@lostmidas
Framechains are the new appchains
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
👀
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Njoku Emmanuel pfp
Njoku Emmanuel
@njokuscript
Yup!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zinger ↑ pfp
Zinger ↑
@zinger
Not sure that I would call the standalone version of most frames a “client” though, I think those are just Farcaster-enabled apps The difference being is that the primary purpose of a FC “client” in my mind is to create and consume casts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

$D741: 👁️🚪 pfp
$D741: 👁️🚪
@heydimitri
Makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction