Mike pfp
Mike
@yekim.eth
think the next iteration of farcaster client is: frames to build use case and distribution -> grow a big enough community that new client is necessary
8 replies
4 recasts
37 reactions

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
frame โ€”> client pipeline is just beginning
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Lost Midas pfp
Lost Midas
@lostmidas
Framechains are the new appchains
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
agree
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Njoku Emmanuel pfp
Njoku Emmanuel
@njokuscript
Yup!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Zinger โ†‘ pfp
Zinger โ†‘
@zinger
Not sure that I would call the standalone version of most frames a โ€œclientโ€ though, I think those are just Farcaster-enabled apps The difference being is that the primary purpose of a FC โ€œclientโ€ in my mind is to create and consume casts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

$D741: ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿšช pfp
$D741: ๐Ÿ‘๏ธ๐Ÿšช
@heydimitri
Makes sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction