i sorta wrote this as a quick sloppy intro for Friday's post to make another point 

but i wanted to see what people thought about the general premise of "backend of society" sentence part. 

is it worth noodling on more? is there a better framing?

cc @jihad @lght.eth you guys have a knack for these kinds of analogies

seeker /native /believein /bedrock 🇵🇸

Open Source and DeAI deep dives at terminallyonchain.xyz

like it off gut instinct. from my pov the area left to refine is “society” 

nerding out for a moment: 

backend of is a solid model imo - confers a specific direction for the reader to infer after your crypto x hero context before it 

society leaves too much room for misunderstanding imo 

backed of [another opportunity to direct your core idea] 

if you’re trying to talk about finances go toward market, economics, or business minded area terms 

if compute, or social, or philosophical go there 

ie. what is a “society” more obviously stated into the specific terminology resonant to what you’re meaning to talk about as the paper goes on

this is a great take on it, thanks for spending the time lght.

so i think next step will be flushing out what the actual terms mean (backend of what exactly?, what component of society?)

no room for it feeling like an ambiguous crypto philosophical take and leaning in to the practical definition