Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
36 replies
3 recasts
66 reactions
Nico
@sneeks.eth
I understand the protocol wanting to win at the client level early stage because they can maintain a bit of leadership and culture control to make sure things grow in the direction they see. "clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol." Can you say more about this?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
can a client ever become more valuable than the protocol?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xmons
@xmon.eth
Doesn't it usually in the long run? e.g. no one monetizing https but many apps r monetizing uniswap the protocol collects no addl fee, but uni the frontend alrdy collects a fee
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Nico
@sneeks.eth
I think the design is to be positive sum, where each client adds value itself, which in turn brings more users, which in turn adds value to the protocol. If a client is limited by the protocol, the would need to extend it, which is much easier with farcaster than with x. I think I might be missing your point though?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
