Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Warpcast *is* the app. There aren’t going to be lots of popular interfaces. Power laws still apply. All the important engagement mechanics happen in the UI.
17 replies
11 recasts
40 reactions
woj ツ
@woj.eth
too early too tell imo 1. you can build a totally new app and leverage building on farcaster purely for the existing liquidity of users. your users would never hear about warpcast 2. warpcast will stay mid (best for most people) for a while, it’s a good opportunity for other clients around specific use cases
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
I support the experimentation and I think someone talented like you could create the .1% outlier that is Tweetdeck or Tweetbot or Buffer. But the features one is able to implement will be limited by what Warpcast is willing to show to the masses.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
woj ツ
@woj.eth
hopefully not, if long term features are not interoperable i’m leaving and yes, people who start on warpcast will only move to warpcast-adjacent apps (like supercast) but i can see a world where 99% of new users onboard through an app called “takes” and warpcast is cooked
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
six
@six
Takes is a great name for a nikita style gen z app
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
woj ツ
@woj.eth
thanks, i still believe some sort of verified anon cancellable takes app will get huge cc @lsankar.eth
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
lucky
@lsankar.eth
we're working on some farcaster stuff rn actually! next week
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
six
@six
I think this was Poaster for a bit by lastcontrarian on twitter. Not sure what happened to that
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
