Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
I don’t buy the “the opportunity costs and risk working on nouns related projects and products is higher than elsewhere” argument for inflated fund requests anymore. Never really have.
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
wiz
@wiz
what prop inspired this?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
Not a specific. Just a 21h road trip kind of thought
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
wiz
@wiz
i see, my 2c is that this is not true for engs working on tech products specifically built for nouns. but generally agree otherwise
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
I don’t fully understand why it’s different to other tech products that are built based on a service agreement.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
wiz
@wiz
because u can’t pay just anyone to build products for nouns. the specific knowledge requirement is very very high. take verbs for instance. there are not many people in crypto that i would feel comfortable paying to do what they did
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
wiz
@wiz
how many people on earth truly understand nouns and can help solve our problems?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Benjamin ⌐◨-◨
@latsko.eth
oh yes, agree. That obviously makes sense and increases the risk and opportunity cost for the DAO as a whole vs the individual - in this case engineer - who cultivated and accumulated unique domain expertise that can be leveraged for higher funding requests.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
