Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
@noun40 brought up an idea that is exciting to me, in the vein of reducing the need for active governance: streaming. Every Noun is entitled to stream a portion of the treasury to some address(es). We can use similar logic to the client rewards as to the allowlist and how much.
8 replies
5 recasts
212 reactions
w-g
@w-g
this drives home that the central area where we need to innovate more is anti-Sybil. This is basically protocolized rounds ( and the ultimate utility of rounds is itself anti-Sybil, whether by leveraging farcaster social graph or other)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Agree it’s a key area. How do you feel about how client rewards is working—have to pass a vote to get added to allowlist?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
w-g
@w-g
imo can’t (& don’t want to) trust the (currently-defined) economic majority, so need a nouncil/citizenshouse-like body that is both eligible for these sorts of protocol incentives *and* allowlists the new members (if also own a noun or some % of a noun). Then need consistent brain energy focused on keeping this body high-signal, continually decentralizing, as neutral as possible (hardest part imo for protocol design..may need a mining incentive for onboarding and a penalty for voting in participants that are later revoked). veto ofc needed to protect this group & current thought is veto should ultimately be governed by noun age . Crypto-native balance of powers might be : capital influences via (%) exit threat, old guys get a louder ‘no,’ builders (incl active governors) get the rest; all bodies dilute in time & 1noun=1vote is left untouched .
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
