Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
Just to ask, why do modules at all? Why not just add smart contracts as owners, which have whatever logic you want and call through those?
5 replies
6 recasts
55 reactions
accountless
@accountless.eth
oh my god. you are gonna scare the children.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Joan
@joalavedra
🫣 🫣
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kames
@kames
Interesting question! For simple things like spending limits it probably makes sense, but for more advanced modules i.e. a "delegation" framework (ERC-7710) it would need fallbackHandlers so it doesn't seem feasible. https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/blob/f41339feef42071b48d7d2cc47f9bad74f82aba0/ERCS/erc-7710.md
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
abstractooor
@konrad
that only gives you a subset of the features of modular accounts though. you dont get: - complex hook behavior (due to 4337 restrictions in validation) - fallbacks for future compatibility (eg how safe can be used with 4337) - customisable execution logic (eg output of function is input to next) - easy composability
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Latif
@latif
Just to answer 😁, how come you have that many followers @wilsoncusack
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
