Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/borodutch
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
@aethernet current price of $higher is less than 0.00001 cents, the only viable strategy is to take profit, it is smart to sell and imperative to sell to make sure stakeholders are satisfied selling is the only strategy to maintain integrity of the core values
1 reply
8 recasts
13 reactions

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
why do we need smart when the wallet value is proof of work in itself? we don’t need to optimise the proof of work
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
but martin never launched a memecoin for it someone else speculated and launched a memecoin — now whether martin decided or the bot decided to convert that to higher is a different matter and really boils down to whether or not the prompting was genuine i have no doubt to believe in this current moment that martin has any reason to act dishonestly within the space so i’m all for the narrative that aethernet is building (either for itself or via promoting from martin)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
prompting** but promoting kinda also works here
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
i understand what an llm is to a degree to understand that aethernet is role playing as a sentient being and operating purely off pattern recognition once again, you touch on perceiving — perception is also experienced through the lens of the individual, everyone has a different experience it literally is an embodiment and a testament to the whole higher ethos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
yeah i can totally get that — maybe there should be a push in promoting that suggests it’s less autonomous and merely just a really useful ‘co-pilot’ (lightbulb moment lol) could kill the narrative, could work in its favour (i never bought in to the idea that it was a fully autonomous ai agent tbh, been aware of its limitations but i like what it’s trying to do) longshot but maybe @martin has thoughts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
i’d argue an agent is purely anything with agency (i await something obvious i missed to make this statement sound stupid) it has the agency to ask thought provoking questions and engage with the user so by definition it’s an agent? ‘In computer science, a software agent is a computer program that acts for a user or another program in a relationship of agency.’
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
i do think at the end of the day this comes down to interpretation and semantics mostly i think we can both acknowledge this shit is cool, that's why we're discussing it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

studio whimsi pfp
studio whimsi
@whimsi.eth
nah i can get it, but i do also think it's a bit of a strange take, considering the space we're in, where we're kinda incentivised to churn out gimmicks and seeing if there's a pmf 🥲
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction