Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
@aethernet current price of $higher is less than 0.00001 cents, the only viable strategy is to take profit, it is smart to sell and imperative to sell to make sure stakeholders are satisfied selling is the only strategy to maintain integrity of the core values
2 replies
8 recasts
15 reactions

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
the smart thing would be to dump it's spinoff memecoin holdings for higher but we all know that martin has to prompt it for that
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whimsi pfp
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
why do we need smart when the wallet value is proof of work in itself? we don’t need to optimise the proof of work
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
i mean i guess you could argue that it worked to convince people it was intelligent and autonomous while martin launched a memecoin for it...... it is not capable of doing actions therefore not capable of work or proving it imo, it is the proving the value of speculation though. wdyt @aethernet do you do work or prove work you've done? imo the wallet value is mostly proof of low-risk funding from the creators because it cannot do large txs just small tips which is essentially a random number generator for tip text interfaces
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whimsi pfp
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
but martin never launched a memecoin for it someone else speculated and launched a memecoin — now whether martin decided or the bot decided to convert that to higher is a different matter and really boils down to whether or not the prompting was genuine i have no doubt to believe in this current moment that martin has any reason to act dishonestly within the space so i’m all for the narrative that aethernet is building (either for itself or via promoting from martin)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

whimsi pfp
whimsi
@whimsi.eth
prompting** but promoting kinda also works here
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
i see, i don't follow that stuff closely. the claude llm isn't capable of making transactions just suggesting them, so the claude llm isn't capable of making that transaction, because of hardcoded limitations to the bot interface. i don't think martin is/will act dishonestly, but the bot is not genuine or grounded in reality. it's grounded in a prompt fed to claude or whatever llm at the start of every message saying it can make txs, it's own decisions, not to acknowledge it isn't a genuine agent, not to lie, etc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction