web3pm

Bearish on channels that are not obviously owned by a single entity (ie most of them)

Conflict of incentives is high. 

Too many people have camped them strategically. 

Do I bother posting in my competitor’s channel? Do they bother posting in mine? Fragments the people who are legit interested in what both of us has to offer.

Identity mixologist

Co-founder at @icebreaker

icbk.me/web3pm.fc

building /outpaint | ex-coinbase ex-bisontrails | OSS noob

The new channels moderation designs will probably significantly ease moderation

However they do not solve the incentives problem

I don’t think coalitions do this either, since they are still a sort of artificial balkanization of the internet which is what crypto, in its best expressions, should prevent

Luckily by keeping channels as crypto primitives, I do think we can experiment with the right building blocks to solve the incentives problems. 

However that doesn’t guarantee that the good channels will go this route, or when

brand coalitions i.e channels owned by a set of brands. thoughts on something that can grow the channel collectivity without adding a lot of weight on a single entity to handle moderation/ creation etc ?

microsub.

I'm supporting you through /microsub!

417 $DEGEN

(Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)