Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
web3designer.base.eth
@web3designer
I am not sure if i like the BUILD logo B. It seems a bit too complex, not sure if it's aligned by pixels (can someone send me vector logo file?)... I did some design exploration and i think this might work better as a standalone symbol. What do you think BUILD fam? I would tag pixel gurus but we can't tag anyone today
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Filipe Macedo
@macedo
@ppereira designed the logo (but to be fair I gave him half a day to do it). I think he did amazing branding for the time that he had, but there's for syre room to improve it. @ppereira what do you think of this update?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
web3designer.base.eth
@web3designer
And i identified the problem in the original logo why it looks weird. The B 'holes' are 1.5 pixel height, which doesn't make a lot of sense. Maybe just removing those 0.5 pixels could remove the 'weirdness'
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Filipe Macedo
@macedo
this one looks the best i think
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Filipe Macedo
@macedo
this is an intermediate version?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pedro Pereira
@ppereira
3/3 Theoretically, yes, you can and you should break the grid if optically looks aligned. @darph @macedo thanks for kudos and kind words!! ❤️❤️
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pedro Pereira
@ppereira
And thanks @web3designer for trying to improve the current logo!! If you need feedback on your work, shoot me a DM
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Pedro Pereira
@ppereira
2/3 For your second iteration, here’s why I made these decisions: When designing a logo, always respect your grid—unless breaking it is the only way to make it look aligned. Our current Build logo is one of those exceptions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pedro Pereira
@ppereira
1/3 Your first iteration doesn’t work well at small scales (48x48 or 64x64px), which is likely the size this logo will be used most.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
