wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp

wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅

@wbnns

0 Following
12200 Followers
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
How to bridge an ERC-20 token on Ethereum (L1) to Base ‡️ https://docs.base.org/docs/tokens/list
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
The following tokens have just been added to the Superchain Token List and will soon become bridgeable to Base via community bridges πŸ”΅ Open Meta / $OMETA πŸ”΅ Rekt / $REKT Token issuers who already have an ERC-20 contract deployed on Ethereum and would like to submit their token for bridging between Ethereum and Base can do so by following the enclosed guide in thread
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Cheers to more challenges may they be the hardest of hard and for the reward greatest of great to fix this world it, it is certain it, cannot wait
0 reply
3 recasts
17 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Heya @zachterrell , I don't think there is a testnet DEX with sufficient liquidity for that pair; what's your address? I'll send you a bunch of testnet USDC πŸ‘
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Grateful for you, Naastaaraan πŸ™
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
I think it will always be possible for people to run nodes, it will just have a cost attributed to it; here are the current recommendations: https://github.com/base-org/node?tab=readme-ov-file#hardware-requirements in the long term, I don't think it will ever be an issue because technology will continue to accelerate to meet demand
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anika pfp
Anika
@anika
Happy holidays from the Base team - the gas target is now at 20Mgas/s! This is a final push before the Base team (and all of Coinbase) takes 2 weeks to rest & recharge for the holidays. Lots of exciting things to come in 2025.
4 replies
74 recasts
354 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Heya, I can't speak for the team but IMO it makes it more resource intensive (costly) to run a Base node, because the hardware needs to be able to acommodate processing more transactions per second I feel like this is acceptable because we're scaling up to connect everyone to a new internet (hardware required will be expensive to power it)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Base's gas target has just been successfully increased and is now 20 Mgas/s
0 reply
3 recasts
14 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
How to bridge an ERC-20 token on Ethereum (L1) to Base ‡️ https://docs.base.org/docs/tokens/list
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
The following tokens have just been added to the Superchain Token List and will soon become bridgeable to Base via community bridges Lizcoin / $LIZ Nektar Network / $NET Ucash / $UCASH Token issuers who already have an ERC-20 contract deployed on Ethereum and would like to submit their token for bridging between Ethereum and Base can do so by following the enclosed guide in thread
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
For builders and almost all Base users, no changes are necessary. But if you're running a Base Node and notice any latency after the increase: 1. Monitor CPU and Disk I/O usage 2. Enhance disk throughput and use disks with lower read/write latency (NVMe SSDs recommended) 3. Improve CPU, focusing on single-core speed You can also stop by the Node Operators channel in the Base Discord if you have any questions and we'll be happy to help you there πŸ‘ πŸ”΅ https://base.org/discord
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Tomorrow, Wednesday, the Base core engineering team will increase the gas target as part of our ongoing efforts to scale Base ⬆️ Raising the gas target helps keep fees on Base low, even during periods when activity on the network is high
1 reply
4 recasts
36 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Heya @superrarejohn , $RARE on L1 but yes, on L2 it does not; I think the issue may be related to the warning symbol due to low volume; I believe they don't include those in search results to protect users I would recommend asking the Uniswap team in their Discord what they recommend to get rid of the warning https://discord.com/invite/uniswap Hope that helps!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
🀝
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
Another dimension to this is that >90% of the world hasn't even used, nor understands, what we're doing The new era of most used apps will be made so they don't have to Web2 experiences that they already know, with the onchain magic happening behind the scenes
2 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
We're still so early
0 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
πŸ«‚ 🀝
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
πŸ«‚ 🀝
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅ pfp
wbnns.base.eth πŸ”΅
@wbnns
A new day, more newly registered domain names
0 reply
2 recasts
11 reactions