Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
memes4airdrop
@wake
@greatgambino.eth has some meat to gnaw on: @razdva has realigned his network to dump allowances on Perl, presumably to thwart [ded...] and exit with bags intact. Now, @perl is aware and already taking action (their game, their discretion)... By pivoting, did razdva discover acceptable practice or is this still misconduct?
18 replies
1 recast
27 reactions
Pichi ๐ช๐๐น๐ฉ ๐ก๐ธ
@pichi
This one was a clear pivot to cash out because they were caught. If they honestly put it into perl and start betting, well thatโs up to @ace and @peter and I trust that they have rails in place to make sure itโs good faith. Iโm hoping they will pivot to @degenpad and contribute to funding ITOs. That would be a nice ending to this story of farmer turned funder.
3 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
memes4airdrop
@wake
But they want to take the money. They're not allowed to just take the money (with extra steps)?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi ๐ช๐๐น๐ฉ ๐ก๐ธ
@pichi
I guess they can try to money launder this way. Weโll see if the @perl team cracks down on it or not. I imagine they will but thatโs just my gut talking.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
memes4airdrop
@wake
No, I mean what I asked: Are we certain, as a community, what the entitlements are for allowances, given the locking requirement? ie, are we /sure/ that allowances are not yield?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Pichi ๐ช๐๐น๐ฉ ๐ก๐ธ
@pichi
I think Iโm missing what you are implying because I mixed coffee and cold medicine ;)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Ramsey ๐ฉ๐ค
@ramsey
@jacek specifically said they were not. Tbh, he first said "APY" (or quoted someone IIRC), then corrected himself. Tbh 2, it would have been "better" if he said so before the allo change system/lock
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction