Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

memes4airdrop pfp
memes4airdrop
@wake
@greatgambino.eth has some meat to gnaw on: @razdva has realigned his network to dump allowances on Perl, presumably to thwart [ded...] and exit with bags intact. Now, @perl is aware and already taking action (their game, their discretion)... By pivoting, did razdva discover acceptable practice or is this still misconduct?
18 replies
1 recast
27 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
This one was a clear pivot to cash out because they were caught. If they honestly put it into perl and start betting, well thatโ€™s up to @ace and @peter and I trust that they have rails in place to make sure itโ€™s good faith. Iโ€™m hoping they will pivot to @degenpad and contribute to funding ITOs. That would be a nice ending to this story of farmer turned funder.
3 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

memes4airdrop pfp
memes4airdrop
@wake
But they want to take the money. They're not allowed to just take the money (with extra steps)?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
I guess they can try to money launder this way. Weโ€™ll see if the @perl team cracks down on it or not. I imagine they will but thatโ€™s just my gut talking.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

memes4airdrop pfp
memes4airdrop
@wake
No, I mean what I asked: Are we certain, as a community, what the entitlements are for allowances, given the locking requirement? ie, are we /sure/ that allowances are not yield?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Ramsey  ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿค  pfp
Ramsey ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿค
@ramsey
@jacek specifically said they were not. Tbh, he first said "APY" (or quoted someone IIRC), then corrected himself. Tbh 2, it would have been "better" if he said so before the allo change system/lock
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

memes4airdrop pfp
memes4airdrop
@wake
Agree with both. He did, he should have. Now we sort out the difference.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction