Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/crucible
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wake
@wake
@greatgambino.eth has some meat to gnaw on: @x7k9p.eth has realigned his network to dump allowances on Perl, presumably to thwart [ded...] and exit with bags intact. Now, @perl is aware and already taking action (their game, their discretion)... By pivoting, did razdva discover acceptable practice or is this still misconduct?
16 replies
1 recast
25 reactions
Pichi 🟪 🍡🌸
@pichi
This one was a clear pivot to cash out because they were caught. If they honestly put it into perl and start betting, well that’s up to @ace and @peter and I trust that they have rails in place to make sure it’s good faith. I’m hoping they will pivot to @degenpad and contribute to funding ITOs. That would be a nice ending to this story of farmer turned funder.
3 replies
0 recast
13 reactions
wake
@wake
But they want to take the money. They're not allowed to just take the money (with extra steps)?
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi 🟪 🍡🌸
@pichi
I guess they can try to money launder this way. We’ll see if the @perl team cracks down on it or not. I imagine they will but that’s just my gut talking.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
wake
@wake
No, I mean what I asked: Are we certain, as a community, what the entitlements are for allowances, given the locking requirement? ie, are we /sure/ that allowances are not yield?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Ramsey 🎩🤝
@ramsey
@jacek specifically said they were not. Tbh, he first said "APY" (or quoted someone IIRC), then corrected himself. Tbh 2, it would have been "better" if he said so before the allo change system/lock
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wake
@wake
Agree with both. He did, he should have. Now we sort out the difference.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction