Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
PSA about the new version of channels 1. They're no longer single topics / hashtags. We tried hashtags for a year and they didn't work. There's no canonical /food channel anymore. Instead, there will be many smaller groups about a topic. 2. The best way to think about the new version of channels — a text-based Twitter Space. There's a group of people (members) "on stage" who can post new stuff in the channel, and a larger group in the "audience". However, anyone in the audience can reply and get discovered / invited to the channel. We've improved how replies work (and making it easy to invite from replies) in the last 24 hours. 3. Casting in your home feed, i.e. no channel, will give you just as much distribution in the algo. We have not been boosting casts from channels you follow but people you don't follow for a while. The results were too inconsistent. 4. Our next big focus will be onboarding new users directly to channels when joining Farcaster.
16 replies
7 recasts
104 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Does the algo favor text over images and frames?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It favors what you are likely to engage with. Each person is different.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Thank you. I dissent realize it was this personal. If we clear our everyone we follow and start over, do we reset our own algorithm too?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
The Dude Bart🐘🌳 ⌐◨-◨
@thedude
oooh this is a good question. I too would like to know the answer to this. @wake.eth was this what you were trying to do the other day?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
wake
@wake.eth
yeah. I do it with spotify from time to time as well. raze the field and grow anew.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Feels like this is the right approach. Will give me something to do on the 15 hour plane ride.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
