will on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

androidsixteen pfp

@androidsixteen.eth

Conventional Silicon Valley wisdom biases towards being “early” to markets rather than being “late”, but this isn’t an absolute — it’s a trade-off just like everything else in life If your product is addressing a market need that isn’t fully there yet (ie. you’re “early”), then the risk taken is around surviving long enough for the market to mature. You can allay this by being lean, achieving ramen profitability, or raising a fat war chest to ride it out Conversely, if the market is already here (ie. you’re “late”), then you’ll face more competition from other products. You’ll have to battle for customers, and the risk becomes more about sales and speed of execution Personally, I prefer the former. The stress of a competitive category is exhausting, and I’d rather build a product for a market that shows glimpses of maturity. That way, when the market arrives in full, you will have had time to build a great product experience and can just scoop up customers

7 replies

6 recasts

174 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

> Conventional Silicon Valley wisdom biases towards being “early” to markets rather than being “late”, but this isn’t an absolute — it’s a trade-off just like everything else in life I don't think that's true. Apple, Google, Facebook were all the last to enter a market that ended up being massive.

2 replies

1 recast

16 reactions

will pfp

is the first to ~pmf somewhat tautologically always last to market? all of these examples weren't "the same but later" but were fundamentally different products serving a proven market better (depending on your perspective..)

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

will pfp

often the earliest movers just ship products that are too skeuomorphic. it takes awhile until someone figure out just what the new market actually is and therefore how to best fit it

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction