Founders

"Burn the idea of MVP. Minimal Viable Product, that is the death zone." - @markpinc the Founder and Executive Chairman of Zynga, offered this advice to founders while visiting the Speedrun stage last week. https://t.co/xf96MpH4He

Common sense in product building finally coming back. Build something good that someone wants to use, not something for your a/b testing framework

Karri Saarinen

minimum lovable product https://x.com/karrisaarinen/status/1884481547492892799

TIL the opposite of MVP: SLC (Simple, Lovable, Complete)

https://longform.asmartbear.com/slc/

Even better framing is simple, lovable, and complete (no minimums)

Even better framing is simple, lovable, and complete (no minimums) https://warpcast.com/sdv.eth/0x236f605e

editor [redacted] prev: everyname (acq. Q4 '23)

not sure how i feel about complete tbh, doesn't feel right to me (products are never complete?)

yeah that's fair

can a product be lovable without being complete? if it can, is completeness really important? if it can't, .. same question?

There should be a version of every product that that itself feels complete - perhaps something that solves a very very specific usecase

To us as builders products are never complete, for end users there should always be a version that is complete and does the specific thing (however small) they need/want to do