Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

nicholas 🧨  pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Farcaster obsession with policing speech like one word replies is obnoxious. Approaching StackExchange levels of pedantry.
11 replies
1 recast
12 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Two options: 1. People change behavior 2. They get hidden by the algo and get frustrated. We’re trying 1. People with plenty of quality casts are fine to use the network however they like. It’s the accounts that are virtually entirely all low effort content.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

will pfp
will
@w
i wonder if there's a way to generate more algorithmic transparency that could help here?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
on the simple end, use a link to a notion (so it can be updated regularly) which describes best & worst practices for encouraging responses & engagement. Could even make new users "sign" it like discord's flow that makes you acknowledge the server rules when you join
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
On the more advanced end.. I'd easily subscribe to regular, personalized "tips" from the algorithm on how to "engage" better
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

will pfp
will
@w
(though you might want to make them opt-out rather than opt-in if you were to implement in WC)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction