Chris Dixon
@cdixon.eth
“The United States’ advantage is decentralized and open innovation. Some people argue that we must close our models to prevent China from gaining access to them, but my view is that this will not work and will only disadvantage the US and its allies. Our adversaries are great at espionage, stealing models that fit on a thumb drive is relatively easy, and most tech companies are far from operating in a way that would make this more difficult. It seems most likely that a world of only closed models results in a small number of big companies plus our geopolitical adversaries having access to leading models, while startups, universities, and small businesses miss out on opportunities.” Mark Zuckerberg - “Open Source AI Is the Path Forward” https://go.fb.me/ceql4u
24 replies
80 recasts
1453 reactions
Breck Yunits
@breck
The math is simple: E=TA! Any society that continues to suffer from the "Intellectual Property" delusion will go extinct. https://breckyunits.com/eta.html
5 replies
1 recast
18 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Please share more on this. I’ve long believed that the right way is “intellectual parenthood” and not property.
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Breck Yunits
@breck
"Intellectual parenthood" wow! That is a great term. I'm going to start using that, thanks.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cobe Liu
@liucobe
Agreed. A singular idea is non-scarce. There is no limit on its creation and spread so as many people can have it without taking it away from others. So it’s silly for the state to protect them. It is apt to say the relationship with an idea will be like one of a parent given a lack of state mandated idea control. Those with ideas will opt to protect them using means like cybersecurity as they nurture and develop them but ultimately that cannot control what happens when the idea is let out to the world. Does intellectual parenthood also imply a cultural shift?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
