Farcaster

I may be missing something, but if I read FIP-2 correctly, this means that FC can be used to comment and react to any URL. Does this mean I could use FC as my commenting system for a blog? If so, how come no one is working on this?

I may be missing something, but if I read FIP-2 correctly, this means that FC can be used to comment and react to any URL. Does this mean I could use FC as my commenting system for a blog? If so, how come no one is working on this? https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/71

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun).

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

wow! This is so big. React and comment on:
- NFTs (I see that channels are comments on specific ERC721 contracts)
- Any page on the web (blog posts, YouTube videos, etc)

Clients chould handle better these cases, like showing "This is a reaction to http://......" and allowing a user to see all reactions/casts on a URL.

yes you can! 

i believe paragraph and eventcaster both use this feature today

🥑🍋 Farmer / LAMP stack dev / Husband / 🌈 Dad / Web1 dude loving a web3 world / Collector of things digital & physical / 
CdeP ‘94 

Yes! I've noticed that channels are already comments to a specific contract. For example, a post in the memes channel sets parent_url to "chain://eip155:7777777/erc721:0x4f86113fc3e9783cf3ec9a552cbb566716a57628"
(IMHO, they should be comments on a specific NFT from the contract, and make this the "channels" contract.)

AFAIK you can do the same thing launchcaster does by using neynar.com

I suppose it could also be used as a commenting/review substrate for collaboration tools

...wow, I think this could be super huge 🤯

engineer @base | /tap /cortex /farhack | dylansteck.com

yup indeed... I've seen @dylsteck.eth doing this a bunch already 👀

I’m really excited about this too, but seems it hasn’t picked up beyond channels.

Cc @dylsteck.eth