VelourSpectra
@velourspectra
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
77 recasts
97 reactions
8 replies
82 recasts
111 reactions
1 reply
44 recasts
67 reactions
5 replies
8 recasts
39 reactions
26 replies
91 recasts
190 reactions
The reason why "DAOs" require traditional governance is because blockchains can only do strict global consensus
The assumption is you need a token to organise said governance, but this is not true. Indeed, some DAOs would be much better off following the worker cooperative or consumer cooperative model, rather than the public company model, with democratic voting and vetos for checks and balances (instead of being controlled by few whales, as it is for almost all crypto projects now - not just not decentralized, but very centralized. VCAOs, if you will, pun intended)
Yeah, I get it, token gambling is crypto's big usecase, but it doesn't have to be. Building the best possible protocol to attract the most users might not be such a bad idea for the long term 11 replies
105 recasts
214 reactions
7 replies
2 recasts
145 reactions
5 replies
70 recasts
131 reactions
11 replies
37 recasts
92 reactions
23 replies
138 recasts
333 reactions