Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
We're starting to think about a new sync model for Farcaster. The current system works but is unlikely to scale up another 10x. Here's our articulation of the problem we want to go after.
15 replies
81 recasts
440 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
We also have a strongly held POV on some goals for the new system. If you find this interesting to work on, please reach out.
3 replies
2 recasts
28 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
And finally, if you're not familiar with Farcaster's sync model, read this first: https://www.varunsrinivasan.com/2024/04/28/the-goldilocks-consensus-problem
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
suppose channels (&membership) are fully onchain, has narrowcasting reinforced/changed your mind around FIP-02 wrt hubs? will there be sidechannels and some "knights of f/topic/new", or already too complex?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

carrrrrlos  pfp
carrrrrlos
@carrrrrlos.eth
@lightcap.eth this would be a pirate free environment ;)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw pfp
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
Glad to see (2) is a priority. I've been thinking for some time how I would build a real-time Dune and w.r.t. Farcaster data it seems like I have to basically build my own "read only" hub to keep things simple on the stats server and application side.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction