Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
The day I can delete Telegram forever will be a great day.
27 replies
9 recasts
127 reactions
Greg
@greg
It’s better than any other messenger tho
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Signal: am I a joke to you?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg
@greg
yes - I don't want to give out a phone number
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
Ah that’s a fair point.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg
@greg
this is why I like the Farcaster direct casts approach by @cassie - same encryption as Signal as far as I understand but no phone number supposedly XMTP plans to take a similar approach over time but Farcaster DCs don't have good good cross platform support + both don't work with groups, so telegram it is for now
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
one challenge with x-platform support is that it intrinsically weakens security. how do you know if your counterparty using a different app is not leaking all your data because of a bad implementation? no one has a good answer for this today.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
Is it even possible to know what app your counterparty is using if the protocol is open? For example, @3num built a version of the Signal client that many use today. When you talk to me on Signal, you have no way of knowing that I am using this client.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
EulerLagrange.eth
@eulerlagrange.eth
1/ I actually do. I call it “optimistically enforced chain of custody”. So Alice and Bob stake some ETH into a contract. When Bob decrypts a message from Alice, Bob’s public key is imprinted on the platintext. To remove Bob’s imprint would also remove Alice’s signature.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
woj ツ
@woj.eth
@polmaire.eth this is a good q what trust assumptions regarding my privacy do i make while using converse?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
