Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
some product x interoperability reflections after using @paragraph for submitting most of my /firstdrafts and reading others. thoughts? 1. i yearn for an inline reading experience native to warpcast. the current read inline frame isn't optimal and i've found myself clicking out more frequently these days (esp because substack / twitter UX is so seamless) cc @v what happened to that FIP? 2. to encourage both consumption and discussion, i want to share highlighted texts (quotes) from paragraph — not mint them. i would like to highlight text from paragraph and then share the highlighted text as a quote in an customizable image-based frame (jpeg quotes are popular across all socials) that either links to the article or makes the quote mintable or both. better for virality, as well. 3. i would "subscribe" to an author to support them vs. mint their article; in an ideal world, paragraph would use @hypersub to accomplish this (esp as authors become more multidimensional "creators")
11 replies
16 recasts
70 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
getting inline article reading right is a lot of work relative to how many people read articles. lower on the priority list relative to other things we want to ship now.
3 replies
0 recast
16 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
fair response, understand why it would be deprioritized. thanks for replying!
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Vladyslav Dalechyn
@dalechyn.eth
possibly frame aspect ratio `1:1.91` (inverse of `1.91:1`) might help to fit more text content from @paragraph and make experience better? might be a low hanging fruit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rue🗽
@rue1776
Yeah a super slick in-line reading experience would be very dope. But I get why it would get back burner-ed That begs the question: what is the priority for y’all currently?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
