We've decided to believe in something.

The creator should take home more than the platform.

If you launch on Larry, you take home 60% of LP fees.

It's retroactive.

Flip it - in this case it's a race to 100 in favor of the creator. This is long-term optimal. End of the day tech is a commodity and brand, like always, is the moat.

Strat/art/design. Thoughts: /user-steen Director: /enjoy Guild: /metaliminal Zora: zora.co/@usersteen

Comparing to the race to zero that NFT marketplaces experienced where there was virtually zero value-add. Though token tech is increasingly a commodity, it's worth mentioning that each launcher offers dif specs, compared to the 0 differentiation of those markets. Soon bots will let you create a token with your own specs. Differentiator will be support after the launch

Ya sure. Race to zero on platform fees is what I meant. Good thing for users.

prediction: marketplace will offer creators

- 100%+ txn fees for superstars (maybe under the table, maybe permissionless)
- 100% txn fees for all the dregs
- <50% txn fees for highlighted spots on ecosystem discovery platforms

confusing fee rebates paid via tokens, not hard currency

solve for equilibrium. I don't think it's 0 or 100