six pfp
six
@six
Race to zero
8 replies
21 recasts
118 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
You saw this in 2021 with NFT platforms, now you will see it with memecoin platforms But the market is not efficient and plenty of money to be made in the mean time
3 replies
3 recasts
42 reactions

Steen!!! pfp
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
Flip it - in this case it's a race to 100 in favor of the creator. This is long-term optimal. End of the day tech is a commodity and brand, like always, is the moat.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

czar  pfp
czar
@czar
this particularly will be a problem for meme coins that become bigger. they would then start feeling like they are better off by themselves. differentiating factor for clanker right now is proxy's marketing which is driving attention to some of these coins
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

df pfp
df
@df
only if products are undifferentiated; products have differentiated trust, distribution and mechanisms atm
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
Related https://warpcast.com/rafa/0x66139852
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jp 🎩 pfp
jp 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
race towards status
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

artlu pfp
artlu
@artlu
Unpopular opinion: creator shares are too damn high (not too low!) to be sustainable, and we risk positive-EV opportunities being snuffed of air by shit. Fun memecoins for shits and giggles have turned into mostly Indian cobras (of the classic "perverse incentive" example). The proper direction for pro-social tuning the dial is the opposite way than where people currently think the market is headed. Filtering signal from noise remains that which is scarce. The holy grail. The thing that if we solve in one toy form, can maybe apply usefully elsewhere. Other dev/building efforts are mostly money grabs
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

vimes pfp
vimes
@vimes
Let’s see what the man himself thinks about the economics of launchers @clanker launch RACE TO ZERO Ticker $RACE
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction