social

Zora and Rodeo rely on low cost, high volume business models. Onchain creators are skeptical. 

Yet, neither exudes confidence in brand messaging:

-Zora: you post here
-Rodeo: you experiment here

Zora's token model wins, but they need to onboard the existing talented onchain creators who remain skeptical (more interesting content actually true here. Selling social posts isn't what onchain creators want.

Rodeo...idk.

Sad that VC money dictated a meta that seemingly avoids building for onchain creatives, of which there are tonnes

Strat/art/design. Thoughts: /user-steen Director: /enjoy Guild: /metaliminal Zora: zora.co/@usersteen

I still have mixed feelings about both, not really fan of this really low cost model, but i really like the $enjoy tipping on Zora.

📷 photographer // linktr.ee/popszi // love books, golf and techno // 🎩degentleman🔵free mint: zora.co/popszi.eth

Rodeo has no longevity. Posts there die, and they'll tell you themselves it's not for art. 

I recommend trying Zora for a couple of months with some consistency. They have the best shot at a new paradigm and it's not close. The secondary tech is brilliant and scales. 

And fwiw the enjoy focus will be on turbocharging Zora distribution. Reworking the allowance mechanics to reward weekly vs historical activity

baffles my mind how so many artists have switched to Rodeo from Zora and thus remove themselves from benefiting from the secondary AMM