What do you think about "userbase-as-a-service"? According to my intuition, this is what generic quest enterprises across crypto enables.

intern @kingpost 🌞 re art, finance & infra 🏝️ generalist researcher , conceptual artist 🌞 /gokhan /philosophy /openfinance /kingpost

icebreaker.xyz/gokhan


re quest-type products, generally not a fan... when it's a generic campaign you might see growth, but it doesn't help you validate hypotheses or get sticky users... might work if a specific campaign focused on problem space/target audience tho

side note: building on top of a protocol is kinda "userbase-as-a-service"?

i really hate them but i think B2B deals among these and protocols cause this type of service to cement. mny protocol/ project people also dislike them. gamifying the already gamified markets w/ o any real play. yup, your sidenote rings and again those suck too. a rent loop on users.

I tend to see from the advantage of web3, that user transactions are already public on blockchain.

If those data and user behaviors are leveraged well, it could be a killer tool to target the right customers for your app.