Ucanseeme
@ucantseeme
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
184 replies
145 recasts
731 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
5 recasts
14 reactions
6 replies
7 recasts
56 reactions
5 replies
10 recasts
35 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
I can get the rebranding Warpcast to Farcaster. I’ve also often had to explain the difference to newcomers, which has somewhat slowed user growth.
I think the Farcaster protocol remains intact. Its rebranding doesn’t change the fact that it’s still an open, permissionless, programmable, composable, crypto-native, and sufficiently decentralized protocol with a thriving ecosystem. Most users won’t even notice the protocol, something social product geeks and Farcaster devs care about.
Unified product names can boost brand identity and user growth by avoiding confusion. eg. most users don’t realize Bluesky is built on the AT Protocol. As its user base grew, multiple clients/apps emerged, enriching the ecosystem. Growth of the main client benefits the protocol, but user growth needs to come first. So, Warpcast(Farcaster)’s rise doesn’t mean it’s replacing the whole Farcaster protocol.
In the end, rebranding may help, but other product-led protocol growth strategies are likely needed as well. 3 replies
2 recasts
22 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
4 replies
5 recasts
44 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
5 replies
14 recasts
71 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
