Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
I was totally out of the loop but I have to say I find it misleading that most L2s and also OP is upgradable. Technically it is not an L2 as long as someone can arbitrarily change the byte code at the contract or not?
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
See Vitalik’s stage 0/1/2 definitions. @jessepollak ‘s roadmap from ethCC: stage 1 by end of this year
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
jesse.base.eth 🔵
@jessepollak
definitely lots more work to do here, but we're making fast progress cc @timdaub.eth
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mark Tyneway
@tynes
Who controls the definition of something? Is it the thing that most people refer to as true? L2 used to be a technical definition, it became a marketing term after Ethereum's rollup centric future became the way
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
This is why I love the stages framing. It’s encouraging, not saying “you’re not a real rollup” It’s simple, he’s not saying “here’s a 3D grid of rollup-like constructions” It’s precise And it points the way to an eventual consensus. Stage 2 or bust
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
