Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
(cherrypicked) harsh t4t bans: both @katekornish and @rjs got banned for t4t and neither of them received a tip from another banned account i'd argue that t4t is a reciprocal thing so i'd expect there's at least one banned account that tipped them back. but that's not the case. discuss (or not)
5 replies
1 recast
20 reactions
Tudor 🟣🟡
@tudorizer
what's the long term effect of the rules being too harsh in your opinion? complete stalemate?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
honestly, i don't know... it can go both ways. if the core user base is solid, it will strengthen it. if not, it'll fall apart. in any case, we probably won't see any rapid user growth (unless degen moons), as this will very likely be discouraging for low effort accounts
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tudor 🟣🟡
@tudorizer
"discouraging for low effort accounts" exactly the goal, I reckon. BTW, from your query, what does it mean if an account is not present? I got a bit lost in the joins.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
the query contains only casts that either tipped a banned account or received a tip from a banned account if you're not present, you didn't tip-interact with such accounts
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
dusan.framedl.eth
@ds8
> "discouraging for low effort accounts" exactly the goal, I reckon. partially yeah... but also: - full-on farmers will find a way - there's a non-zero chance a low effort account becomes a quality DAU
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
