Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alex
@asenderling.eth
This tweet demonstrates the intellectual bankruptcy of the left. Once you're already at the worst possible description you lose a sense of nuance or daylight between Trump's policy and Harris'. The practical result is full ethnic cleansing and 1,000s of lives. https://x.com/NathanJRobinson/status/1886937360920666438
7 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
Trish🫧
@trish
Yes for sure but also demonstrates the failure of democrats to recognize that, for many reasons, voters didn’t see a difference and so they didn’t show up. I feel less inclined to blame voters and more inclined to hold the Democratic Party for failing to speak on things voters care about
3 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
MM
@listen2mm.eth
I do blame Harris, her campaign managers, Dem leaders, etc for not executing a stronger campaign and meeting enough voters where they were at I also blame individuals’ and their critical reasoning abilities for not being able to see the differences between a Trump admin and a Harris admin with regards to Gaza/Israel, among other issues So basically I agree with what you’re saying. Just clarifying I do think voters who claimed to be Israel/Palestine single issue voters and not willing to vote for Harris were/are extremely naive, at best.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Trish🫧
@trish
Honestly, for people who have been following the conflict, I can’t blame people for not being “practical”. I don’t want to call single issue anti-genocide voters stupid. It’s hard to for people to care about other things when they are following closely That said, see my reply to @asenderling.eth. I agree with the practicality but Dems handed this to MAGA and I don’t want to fight with voters until the Democrats fix themselves
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MM
@listen2mm.eth
I guess I probably just think too practically on these types of things and have a hard time processing it differently. I understand people being upset with Biden for his handling of Israeli relations, and then Harris for not taking a strong/different enough stance in her campaign, and fighting them on that as much as possible. When the rubber meets the road, to then say “the difference between Trump & Harris is negligible” and/or “I would rather spite Harris and make life even harder for Palestinians with a US president who will definitely not listen to pro-Palestinian constituents, rather than vote for her Harris and give Palestinians a chance of improved circumstances with a US president who is at least pushing for a ceasefire and more closely aligned to pro-Palestinian constituents” — that does not make sense to me. Voting for a third party with 0% chance of winning does 0 to help Palestinians. I am all for pressuring change in D Party. I think it’s also reasonable to examine voter behavior
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
