daos

ok so this one seems to have done pretty well:
- a classic case, where everyone has tokens but almost nobody is committed, so you end up with a huge "community" on paper & burned out team in reality

btw - initially i planned on copy pasting text, but if i link tweets instead, i can add additional commentary + you can read what people commented on the original posts

is that better or would you prefer i post them directly with no commentary?

DAOs are a lot better at distributing ownership than they are at distributing responsibility

peth.eth

ok so this one seems to have done pretty well:
- a classic case, where everyone has tokens but almost nobody is committed, so you end up with a huge "community" on paper & burned out team in reality

btw - initially i planned on copy pasting text, but if i link tweets instead, i can add additional commentary + you can read what people commented on the original posts

is that better or would you prefer i post them directly with no commentary?

https://x.com/petheth/status/1905652099746349463

On a crusade to spread the gospel of The World Computer by transmuting case studies into purple pills like https://builtonethereum.network

Decay is a very interesting mechanism for governance.

Do you think the economic side and the responsibility side being separated? Either 2 tokens or a token for economic incentive and something else more programmable for responsibility/governance?

I agree. I think most "DAO" members are actually just trying to get access to economic upside while operators are conflating governance participation with financial exposure. 

Figuring out this difference on the protocol/incentive/reputation layer I think will help unlock better expectations and actionable participation opportunities.

i for sure think there should either be decay or some cost to being a member, so that theres a downside to being completely inactive

i generally hate the idea of incentivizing governance, my original tweet was mostly aiming at the lack of accountability

the percentage of passive holders & armchair governors, vs people actually doing shit

when running a DAO, my 1) problem has been people saying theyre gonna do something, and then not doing it

in big DAOs, such things happen less often in core teams, but they happen at the grants level