Nearchos

I'm wandering and wondering. Interested in decentralized and cool and creative stuff. Worked on a DAO for 5 years and looking for something new.

I think you're really getting down to some brass tacks here.

This is the direction I'm hoping we can go! More options for ways to interact with the Farcaster social graph. 

@fiids has been fun to play with, but lots to undercover in the use case analysis. What I'd like is separating all of this into different feeds/experiences: 

- stuff in the trenches: tokens, builders, apps, memes, etc that I want to interact with, likely onchain

- global news and general updating where I just need accurate and unbiased summaries that I can flag for later review. This includes newsletter roundups and the like.

- DAO/community content that not only do I need to interact with, but cross-pollinate between communities and build actual relationships through deep discussions.

- deeper thinking where it's all long form content and you want to sit with things and digest slowly and write down your reactions and make connections with other related work & ppl.

Just a few of the initial structures that have been on my mind.

Curious how this resonates for @nicovrg and @alvesjtiago.eth because it feels kind both of you are sort of building around this general problem space.

Imo, people need more optionality and flexibility with how they interact with their social graph based on what they are doing at any given moment, now that so much of our online/onchain activities are getting mashed together on a single UX.

building fiids.xyz, bondes.xyz, wyat.live and deescuss.com

dev, armchair economist & crypto tea leaves reader - 

/futarchy /network-states

Professional client for people who live on Farcaster (/fiids). Available at https://www.fiids.xyz

I greatly appreciate that you see the value in open data creating this opportunity space!

- We have to have a voice in what these screens throw in front of us -

This is the appropriate place to focus on user agency: choosing what/how/when we are exposed to information.

This seems more empowering to express the best versions of ourselves when we choose to act. Not just the most vulnerable versions of ourselves that are most easily exploited.

ultimately I think it boils down to:
1. what you consume
2. how you act on that information

this is what I'm trying to solve with @fiids.
the optionality and flexibility are key to the two points above and hopefully with open data it is possible to create your own feeds of data and actions.