daos

What features could increase accountability for teams who receive grant funding?

Building /farcastle. Tryna help humans coordinate. Just /yeet it. TANSTAAFL! https://bootleggers.wtf/

I think a big part of the task for accountability is actually on the org providing funding.

Just giving away money and saying "be responsible" isn't really helpful. 

Putting onerous metric tracking obligations on recipients who are focused on shipping isn't really helpful.

I think grant orgs need to have skin in the game so they become accountable to themselves.

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

We're offering  a new, 4-week accelerator program that is available for builders with at least one grant, focused on achieving growth and sustainability.

Get hands-on guidance from top industry experts and work alongside other committed builders to refine your business model and expand your user base.  More info,  & link to application here. Tell your friends!  👇 👇 

https://twitter.com/OctantApp/status/1831164316684312607

Kudos to Octant for being ahead of the curve here (unrelated to my advocating for it, but I was impressed to see it):

Kudos to Octant for being ahead of the curve here (unrelated to my advocating for it, but I was impressed to see it):

https://warpcast.com/octant/0x376889d6

That being said, there are basic project responsibility habits that grant orgs could lay out for recipients, like providing project/milestone/task tracking tools.

What if grant orgs provided an entire suite of tools and training to help incubate their recipients into becoming more effective at shipping and tracking.

Let's go even further; grant orgs could provide skilled professional services to accelerate results from their recipients. 

When you start focusing on provider responsibility it starts getting really interesting.