Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/daos
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ฮž2T ๐Ÿฐ pfp
ฮž2T ๐Ÿฐ
@earth2travis
What features could increase accountability for teams who receive grant funding?
4 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Wasabi ๐Ÿฅฅ๐ŸŒด pfp
Wasabi ๐Ÿฅฅ๐ŸŒด
@wasabi
@gitcoin is working on a workshop around this topic. But on a high-level the most simple thing to do is "milestones-based payments", little overhead, and it is up to the grantee to deliver after the grant is approved.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
I think a big part of the task for accountability is actually on the org providing funding. Just giving away money and saying "be responsible" isn't really helpful. Putting onerous metric tracking obligations on recipients who are focused on shipping isn't really helpful. I think grant orgs need to have skin in the game so they become accountable to themselves.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Timbrrr ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿงข โ†‘ ๐Ÿ– pfp
Timbrrr ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿงข โ†‘ ๐Ÿ–
@twb
One of The only solutions is delegates with subject matter expertise keep them accountable, if teams ship delayed get paid. Win win
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jord pfp
Jord
@jord
Escrow type mechanisms that pay once the work is completed is the fairest and most straightforward, imo.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction