Governance

Thinking about a new service offering: governance delegation!

Anyone have any professional delegate experience? Curious about offering multiple "proxy" delegates, each with their own policy priorities, rather than one monolithic delegate - but I'm not sure if that makes sense.

Organization services: www.clinamenic.com
 // 
Newsletter: solosalon.clinamenic.com // @journodao @opencivics // /journalism /philanthropy

That's essentially what Validators are in all Cosmos/tendermint/cometbft networks. 

They vote with the collective stake weight of everyone delegating to them. They can choose to override the validator's vote at any time on any vote.

Decentralizing infrastructure with Kleomedes |

Building collaboration with Nearchos |

/octant Community Grants Council |

/colinks-and-co CoDAO Council

No standards. It's the wild wild wild west.

Some groups are starting to self organize around more structure. Kijira did a big long experiment with councils and delegates. Juno has been drafting a charter system. But it's pretty early stage stuff, nothing formalized. 

Validators are just expected to abstain voluntarily if there's a valid conflict of interest brought up by someone.

Do you know if there are any standards/requirements for delegates there, or any best practices around disclosure or whatnot? EG if a proposal comes up that I have a conflict of interest in