growth

Yaps on X/ power badge on warpcast - they have been very powerful primarily because they are insanely hard to game ( their algorithm that measures your quality of contribution / impact). 

Starting to think if one could thus build "impact to earn" : get paid permissionlessly for hard to game impact 

SS: a bonding curve that defines how many tokens you get allocated basis a relative impact score.

Community first transparent , rewards genuine impact aka "proof of impact"

Could use bunch of primitives such as web proofs @dawufi , just zk proofs, attestation standards etc.

thot leadership at /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

Seems highly controversial that they are impossible, more less even difficult to game. 

Incentivize any metric enough to make it a goal in itself and it'll stop being a useful metric.

Co founder @Intract - private data stack for AI & crypto use cases. Documenting my journey to become 100x AI first founder. Growth nerd, part time guitar player

Seems highly controversial that they are impossible, more less even difficult to game. 

Incentivize any metric enough to make it a goal in itself and it'll stop being a useful metric. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

think the algo to calculate impact score (e.g. yaps) will need to keep evolving for the system to continue being difficult to game. but get your point..